[ASC-media] Fwd: Hype and Hoops and what we do
jtyler at scibizmedia.com.au
jtyler at scibizmedia.com.au
Tue Aug 1 11:18:33 CEST 2006
> This didn't go up earlier - apologies if you get it twice. It says
> the same sorts of things as Julian's later email, although with
> less passion!
> Go Julian and count me in!
> Jess Tyler
> SciBiz Media
> publicity • media • science conferences • training
> M: 0408 298 292
> E: jtyler at scibizmedia.com.au
> PO Box 71
> Blackmans Bay TAS 7052
> Begin forwarded message:
>> From: jtyler at scibizmedia.com.au
>> Date: 1 August 2006 3:32:36 PM
>> To: Rob Morrison <rob.morrison at flinders.edu.au>
>> Cc: Bruce Wright <bruce.wright at greenhouse.crc.org.au>, ASC List
>> <list at asc.asn.au>
>> Subject: Hype and Hoops and what we do
>> Rob, I couldn't agree more. I also agree with Bruce - life is
>> tough and science must sell papers.
>> Papers also need to show some support for the science and its
>> potential for their readership. If they want advertising and
>> readers, how about they step forward. Do the political, business
>> and finance rounds have to listen to similar arguments? I think
>> not. The politics of politics and business secures their position.
>> It is time for a concerted push or movement and for us to take
>> responsibility for addressing the imbalances that perplex us.
>> I too, had thought the AusSMC as an ideal conduit - approached in
>> concert with FASTS, ANZAAS or similar. AusSMC is the single most
>> important initiative and is a model that can be used on smaller
>> scales elsewhere.
>> I'd also like to add to the equation that science media is
>> drastically under-represented in all the media directories
>> available. Margaret Gees, Media Monitors and AAP all carry good
>> broad science connections, but the plethora of newsletters we all
>> subscribe to and produce is simply missing. These newsletters are
>> perhaps some of the most important news conduits for our science,
>> direct to the markets for science (outside the public domain).
>> I have already approached AAP on this topic and they are willing
>> to listed. They're even excited. I believe with the representation
>> through ASC/AusSMC, we could have a really good go at getting
>> these lists up and running. I put my hand up to coordinate. I am
>> committed to this idea. It's a big job, but it's time has come.
>> Once we have adequate representation in the media directories, we
>> there have a mudmap of where we are and where the science
>> communication is happening. This is might effective material when
>> it comes to negotiating with mass media.
>> I agree that ASC should be lobbying for more reporters, and again
>> add to the mix that a national scheme of scholarships/fellowships
>> at media outlets would be grand - vis a vis Ian Goodwin et al at
>> the ABC Science Media fellowship.
>> Bruce is right in stories must sell papers - but when the papers
>> are routinely not working on how to get science advertised, and
>> pay only lip service to reporting science, it's up to us. There
>> are many ways that science organisations would support advertising
>> - with more dedication to the round, even the most cynical editor
>> could concede this.
>> I'm willing to take this further. Any takers?
>> Jess Tyler
>> SciBiz Media
>> publicity • media • science conferences • training
>> M: 0408 298 292
>> E: jtyler at scibizmedia.com.au
>> PO Box 71
>> Blackmans Bay TAS 7052
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ASC-media